PPAP: How Suppliers Prove a Production Process Is Ready

- PPAP provides evidence of a consistent process: It shows that a supplier's production process can consistently meet requirements during production, not just on a single sample.
- The 18 elements are interconnected: Design records define requirements, process controls define how the part is made, and data prove it. The PSW ties them together.
- The submission level depends on the customer: The customer's requirements set the level, with Level 3 common for new part introductions.
A part can pass inspection and still raise questions about whether the process can repeatedly produce the same part.
That is what PPAP answers. It combines design records, process controls, measurements, testing, and other evidence to show that a supplier is ready to produce the part to the customer's requirements.
Much of that evidence starts as quality data on the shop floor, which FlowFuse captures directly from machines and gauges.
This article covers what PPAP is, its 18 elements, the submission level requirements, and the approval process, including what goes into the Part Submission Warrant (PSW).
What Is PPAP?
PPAP is the Production Part Approval Process, a structured process that shows a supplier's production process can meet the customer's engineering and quality requirements on each run, not just on a single sample.
The Automotive Industry Action Group publishes PPAP as one of its Quality Core Tools, alongside APQP, FMEA, MSA, and SPC.
PPAP is most associated with automotive manufacturing, though other industries use similar part approval processes with different requirements.

The 18 Elements Of The Production Part Approval Process
PPAP is made up of 18 elements covering the product and process, measurement systems, testing, samples, and approval. The table below puts them into four areas to show how they are related. The groups are not part of the PPAP requirements.
| PPAP Element | What It Covers | |
|---|---|---|
| Design & Engineering Documentation | Establishes what the part needs to be and documents the engineering requirements, approved changes, and potential design risks. | |
| 1 | Design Records | Engineering specifications, drawings, dimensions, tolerances, materials, and other requirements the part needs to meet. |
| 2 | Engineering Change Documents | Documentation and approvals for engineering changes affecting the submitted part. |
| 3 | Customer Engineering Approval | Record of customer engineering approval when required for the part or an engineering change. |
| 4 | Design FMEA (DFMEA) | Analysis of potential product-design failure modes, their effects and causes, and the actions taken to reduce design risk. |
| Process Planning & Control | Defines how the part will be manufactured and how potential process risks and important characteristics will be controlled. | |
| 5 | Process Flow Diagram | The sequence of manufacturing, inspection, handling, and other operations used to produce the part. |
| 6 | Process FMEA (PFMEA) | Analysis of potential failures within the manufacturing process and the controls used to prevent or detect them. |
| 7 | Control Plan | Production controls, measurements, specifications, sampling methods, and reaction plans used to control important product and process characteristics. |
| Product & Process Evidence | Shows that production parts meet defined requirements and that the measurement, testing, and process controls provide the required results. | |
| 8 | Measurement System Analysis (MSA) | Shows that the measurement systems used for product and process checks are suitable and provide reliable results. |
| 9 | Dimensional Results | Measurement results showing that production samples meet the dimensions and tolerances specified in the design record. |
| 10 | Material & Performance Test Results | Results from required material, functional, performance, or other specified tests. |
| 11 | Initial Process Studies | Analysis of process performance or capability for selected characteristics during initial production runs, where required. |
| 12 | Qualified Laboratory Documentation | Documentation supporting the qualification of laboratories used to perform required testing. |
| 13 | Appearance Approval Report (AAR) | Approval of appearance characteristics such as color, texture, gloss, grain, or other visual requirements when applicable. |
| Production Samples, Records & Approval | Brings together production samples, reference and inspection records, customer-specific requirements, and the formal documentation used to complete the PPAP submission. | |
| 14 | Sample Production Parts | Parts produced using the intended production process, tooling, materials, and production environment as required. |
| 15 | Master Sample | An approved reference sample retained for comparison, inspection, or training, when applicable. |
| 16 | Checking Aids | Gauges, fixtures, templates, models, or other inspection aids used to verify the part. |
| 17 | Records of Compliance with Customer-Specific Requirements | Records demonstrating compliance with additional requirements defined by the customer, such as specific forms, tests, documentation, or submission rules. |
| 18 | Part Submission Warrant (PSW) | The formal document summarizing the PPAP submission and the supplier's declaration that the applicable requirements have been met. |
The elements are interconnected, not 18 separate documents. The Design Record defines what the customer requires. The Process Flow Diagram, PFMEA, and Control Plan define how the supplier will manufacture and control the part. MSA, dimensional results, testing, and initial process studies then show that the process and its controls are working as intended, and the Part Submission Warrant brings the submission together for customer review.
PPAP Levels Explained
PPAP defines five submission levels, each setting how much of the 18-element package the supplier submits to the customer. The customer defines the level, usually in the PPAP request, supplier manual, or purchase order. Anything not submitted is maintained by the supplier and made available if requested.
PPAP Level 1
Only the Part Submission Warrant (PSW) is submitted.
PPAP Level 2
The PSW, product samples, and limited supporting data are submitted.
PPAP Level 3
The PSW, product samples, and the complete supporting data package are submitted. Level 3 is commonly requested for new part introductions because it gives the customer the complete supporting data package without an on-site review.
PPAP Level 4
The PSW is submitted along with whatever other requirements the customer defines, so the contents vary from customer to customer.
PPAP Level 5
The PSW, product samples, and complete supporting data are reviewed at the supplier's manufacturing location.
The Significant Production Run
The sample parts and data in a PPAP are pulled from a significant production run. Unless the customer specifies otherwise, the AIAG PPAP manual defines this as one to eight hours of production totaling at least 300 consecutive parts, made at the production site with the production tooling, gauging, materials, process, and operators.
Initial process studies are typically calculated from this run. Customer-specific requirements determine the acceptance criteria for these studies. Common capability criteria use thresholds such as a Cpk or Ppk of 1.33 or 1.67, depending on the characteristic and the customer.
What The Part Submission Warrant Includes
The PSW is the summary document the customer signs off on, and a separate PSW is generally completed for each part number unless the customer agrees otherwise. Typically, it records:
- Part number, part name, drawing number, and engineering change level
- Part weight
- The supplier's manufacturing site
- The reason for submission, such as a new part, engineering change, or tooling change
- The requested submission level
- Whether dimensional, material and performance, appearance, and statistical results meet requirements
- A declaration signed by an authorized supplier representative, including the production rate from the significant production run
- A customer disposition field recording the approval decision
PPAP Approval Status
After the submission is reviewed, the customer records one of three dispositions defined in the AIAG PPAP manual:
- Approved: The part and process meet the customer's requirements, and the supplier is authorized to ship production quantities.
- Interim approval: Shipment is permitted for a limited time or quantity while open issues are resolved, typically under an action plan agreed with the customer. Full approval is still required.
- Rejected: The submission does not meet requirements. The supplier must correct the issues and resubmit before production shipments are authorized.
When Is PPAP Required?
PPAP may be required when a change could affect how a part is made or how it performs. Each customer defines its specific submission triggers in its supplier manual, but most fall under a few categories.
The most common trigger is a new part, meaning a part number the supplier has never produced for that customer. An engineering or design change, such as a new drawing revision, tolerance, or material specification, also requires approval before the changed part ships.
Changes to how or where the part is made are treated the same way. These include a new manufacturing method or process sequence; new, replacement, or refurbished tooling; moving production to another line or plant; and switching to a new source for material or an outsourced operation. Many customers also require PPAP when production resumes on tooling that has been inactive for a long period, often 12 months or more.
A process correction after a significant quality problem can also trigger a new submission, typically as part of a corrective action.
The supplier is expected to notify the customer before making any of these changes. The customer then decides whether a complete PPAP, a partial resubmission covering only the affected elements, or another form of approval is required.
Final Thoughts
PPAP boils down to documented evidence that a production process can consistently meet requirements at production rates. Approval is commonly followed by a safe launch period, where the customer checks that proof against full production.
For manufacturers running several plants, most of the work goes into gathering that evidence. Dimensional results, test data, and capability studies sit in gauges, inspection systems, and MES platforms, and are typically copied into spreadsheets by hand before each submission. With FlowFuse, teams capture those measurements during production, tied to each part. Once the pipeline is established, FlowFuse lets them roll it out to other plants and secure and manage every deployment from one place.
Stop Rebuilding PPAP Data in Spreadsheets
See how FlowFuse captures dimensional, test, and capability data from your gauges and inspection systems as parts are produced, ready for every submission at every plant.
Frequently Asked Questions
About the Author
Sumit Shinde
Technical Writer
Sumit Shinde is a Technical Writer at FlowFuse specializing in industrial automation and manufacturing. In the past three years, he has built industrial applications and authored more than 100 technical articles covering industrial connectivity, unified data architecture, production metrics, and quality management for modern manufacturing.
Like what you're reading?
Add FlowFuse as a preferred sourceOn the page that opens, check the box next to flowfuse.com to see more of our articles in your Google Search results.
Related Articles:
- 5 Whys Analysis Template: Free Download
- Fishbone Diagram Template: Free Download
- First Article Inspection (FAI): Process, Requirements & Report
- Layered Process Audit Checklist: Free Template and Examples
- VDA 6.3 Process Audits Explained: Structure, Scoring, and How to Prepare
