ROI calculator
Industrial automation ROI, in your numbers.
Three places industrial automation teams quietly bleed money: hunting for information, manual rework, and tracking downtime. Plug in your numbers, every figure below traces to published research.
Your team
Waste elimination
Each engineer loses about 416 hours a year (20% of the week) tracking down documentation and context. FlowFuse Expert surfaces it instead.
Speed to deploy
Reusing components instead of rebuilding, and shipping through pipelines instead of walking machine to machine.
Fault tolerance
When something breaks and you can’t roll back fast, machines sit idle, engineers scramble, and you’re exposed to client disputes.
Directional estimate for comparison, not a quote. Every input is yours to change.
Who this is for
How to justify the ROI of industrial automation to your boss
Improvements in speed of deployment, waste elimination, and machine uptime directly affect operational costs and revenue. Here’s how to justify ROI to decision-makers, depending on your business
System integrators & automation partners
More output per engineer
Reusable Blueprints and versioned pipelines cut the time to ship each site, so the same team handles more work without adding headcount. That’s an increase in revenue and speed of deployment, the largest single line for most integrator teams.
Manufacturers & plant engineering teams
One avoided outage pays for the platform
A single unplanned line stop can cost more than a year of licensing. Snapshots, one-click rollback, and remote deployment turn a multi-hour recovery into minutes. That is uptime and recovery speed, and it is why the payback window in this calculator is usually measured in months rather than years.
OEMs & machine builders
Grow your install base without growing support headcount
Manually managing multiple sites by remoting in, tracking versions, etc. stops scaling past a few dozen machines. Centralized device management and staged rollout keep per-site cost flat as the fleet grows, compounding waste elimination and speed to deploy at once.
The evidence
The research behind the ROI analysis
Every figure traces to published research, and the defaults are set deliberately on the conservative side.
is lost searching for internal information.
McKinsey Global Institute — The Social Economy (2012)of developer time goes to maintenance & technical debt — ~42% of the week.
Stripe — The Developer Coefficient (2018)of the effort to create new work recreates something that already exists.
IDC / Susan Feldman — KMWorld (2004)productivity gain from systematic software reuse.
Lim — IEEE Software (1994)faster failure recovery for teams that automate deployment & rollback.
Google / DORA — State of DevOps (2021)average cost of unplanned downtime (the default here is far lower).
ABB — Value of Reliability survey (2023)lost to unplanned downtime across the Fortune Global 500 — 11% of revenue.
Siemens — True Cost of Downtime (2024)median US wage for controls/automation engineers, before the ~1.25–1.4× loaded multiplier.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics, OEWS (May 2024)1 · Waste elimination. Engineers lose ~20% of the week finding information (McKinsey). We recover the share you set (default 30%): engineers × salary × 0.20 × recovery.
2 · Speed to deploy. Building from scratch and hand-deploying is labor you can reclaim with reuse and pipelines: (apps × hrs/app × reuse% + deploys × hrs/deploy × pipeline%) × hourly rate. Reuse gains are grounded in Lim (40–57%); deployment automation in DORA.
3 · Fault tolerance. Slow recovery means idle machines and engineers: incidents × downtime hrs × cost/hr × avoided%. The $125k/hr industry average (ABB) is the ceiling; we default far lower.
Net & payback. A representative FlowFuse package cost is subtracted from gross savings to show net savings, an ROI multiple, and a payback window. It’s an estimate for comparison — see FlowFuse pricing for what each product includes, or book a demo for an exact quote.